Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 00:26
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Eligendi molestiae corrupti numquam voluptatum doloremque laudantium eum.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Saquon Barkley unveiled as ‘Madden NFL 26’ cover star with famous backwards hurdle - New York Post
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Patch Notes: New Co-op Emotes! — Warcraft Rumble - Blizzard News
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
The Best Clone Characters To Create In The Alters - GameSpot
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
How do introverts celebrate their birthday?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.